Skip to main content

Why Coaching Regulation is Vital in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Why Coaching Regulation is Vital in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

As coaches, we’ve enjoyed a certain level of autonomy in our profession – no one has dictated who can use the title “coach”. However, this has also led to an influx of untrained or poorly trained individuals calling themselves coaches, despite not carrying the requisite knowledge or training to provide safe coaching. While coaching has long been touted as a transformative tool, negative coaching can cancel out the good.

As artificial intelligence enters the coaching space through language modelling, many coaches are concerned about its lack of firsthand experience, knowledge, and understanding of the global code of ethics. But predatory coaches operate daily without any such restraints, and ill-trained coaches lead the lives of clients in a distorted way without any ethical framework. It is imperative, as artificial intelligence begins to show its potential in coaching, that we start thinking about regulation to ensure safe and professional coaching practices.

The Need for Coaching Regulation

As the popularity of coaching continues to rise, the need for coaching regulation becomes increasingly urgent. Coaches appeared everywhere during the pandemic – with courses advertised as “$7 course to become a fully qualified coach in one day” and similar, creating a profit from “training” coaches. The impact of this is severe, as clients may be exposed to unsafe coaching practices, causing long-term damage. Additionally, the rise of AI coaching poses a new threat as many AI coaching systems do not adhere to the Global Code of Ethics subscribed to by professional coaches worldwide. The solution to this issue lies in the adoption of coaching supervision as well as the regulation of AI coaching to ensure the ethical practice of coaching is upheld.

The emergence of AI coaching in the industry

Robot's Hand Holding an Artificial Intelligence Computer Processor Unit

As technology continues to advance, so too does the emergence of AI coaching in the industry. While it may seem like a convenient and cost-effective option, limited research on the efficacy of AI coaching raises concerns about its effectiveness compared to that of human coaches. However, with more and more businesses turning to AI coaching, it’s clear that the industry needs to adapt and regulate its use to ensure that clients are receiving optimal support and well-being. Europe’s proposed legal framework on AI is a step towards achieving this, while balancing the importance of maintaining human connection in the coaching process. As coaching evolves in the age of AI, it’s crucial to consider its potential risks and prioritise the need for regulation to protect individuals and their fundamental rights.

Limited research on the efficacy of AI coaching

As mentioned earlier, AI coaching is a relatively new concept in the coaching industry, and limited research has been done on its efficacy. While studies have shown that both human coaches and AI coaches can effectively help clients reach their goals, there is still a lack of understanding of how AI coaching actually works and its potential risks. This knowledge gap further emphasises the need for coaching regulation and guidelines, especially since AI technology is advancing rapidly. As a coach, it is important to stay informed and aware of the evolving coaching landscape and the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating AI technology in practice.

The Need for Coaching Regulation in the Age of AI

Coaching Regulation book. Law, rules and regulations concept.

As AI coaching continues to emerge in the industry, it becomes increasingly essential to establish coaching regulation in the age of AI. The efficacy of human coaches has been well-researched and established, while limited research is available on the efficacy of AI coaches. It is crucial to ensure the quality and effectiveness of coaching services provided, particularly in the context of AI coaching. Moreover, there are potential risks associated with AI coaching, such as the lack of human connection and the possibility of incorrect responses. Establishing coaching regulations will ensure that clients receive the highest quality services, and coaches are held to professional standards. The proposed legal framework on AI by Europe highlights the significance of regulating AI in various industries.

Coaching regulation will ensure that the use of AI technology will not compromise the quality of human connections and empathic skills of coaches. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on balancing the use of AI technology and human connections in coaching. Coaching regulation is necessary for the future of the industry, especially in the context of emerging AI technology.

Europe’s proposed legal framework for AI

Europe is leading the way in addressing these concerns with its proposed legal framework on AI. The regulation’s risk-based approach categorises the uses of artificial intelligence and restricts them according to their potential impacts on individuals. This framework, overseen by the European Artificial Intelligence Committee in conjunction with national authorities, sets a global standard for humancentric AI. Nonetheless, while AI technology can enhance coaching outcomes, it must be balanced with human connection and safety. As the coaching industry evolves, it is essential to keep up with developments in AI technology and the regulations that govern them, embracing the benefits while mitigating the risks.

The Importance of Balancing Human Connection and AI Technology in Coaching

It’s clear that AI coaching has its benefits, but it’s equally evident that human coaches provide something that AI cannot: empathy and emotional intelligence. As our world continues to digitise, it’s essential to strike a balance between AI technology and human connection in coaching. Using AI as a catalyst to scale personalisation or connect us with others on a more human level is crucial. However, we cannot ignore the potential risks associated with relying solely on AI for coaching. The proposed legal framework on AI in Europe emphasises the importance of human oversight in AI decision-making, and the coaching industry should follow suit. As a coach, ensuring that you prioritise human connection and use AI as a tool will remain paramount in providing the best possible customer experience for your clients.

The Future of Coaching in the Age of AI

Computer circuit board socket in the form of the human brain

In the rapidly-evolving landscape of coaching, the integration of AI technology is inevitable. However, while AI presents exciting opportunities to expand the reach and advantages of coaching, coaches must be cognizant of the potential risks associated with AI coaching. As the industry progresses towards a more digital future, it’s crucial to balance the human connection that is at the core of coaching, with the power of AI.

Finding this balance will be essential to distinguishing effective coaches from those that prioritise technological efficiency at the expense of personal connection. The future of coaching will rely on the ability to blend the creativity, expertise, and personal touch of human coaches with the potential of AI technology to help individuals achieve their goals and unlock their fullest potential.

The Benefits of Coaching Regulation

Coaching has always been an unregulated profession, allowing anyone to use the title “coach” regardless of their training or knowledge. This has resulted in a flood of untrained and poorly trained individuals offering coaching services. In the age of AI, this problem is only set to worsen, as language modelling technology enables anyone to offer “coaching” services. However, AI lacks the understanding of ethical practices and the Global Code of Ethics that professional coaches subscribe to. Therefore, regulation is necessary to protect clients from ill-trained and predatory coaches. Coaching Supervision is an essential tool for ensuring ethical coaching practice, and the introduction of AI coaching only adds to its significance. It’s time for the coaching profession to embrace regulation and ensure that coaching is beneficial to all.

A. Protection for clients

As professional coaches, we have never been required to comply with any regulatory board or authority to be considered coaches. This lack of gatekeeping has allowed for predatory and self-interested coaches to thrive – as we can see within a few minutes on social media. As we enter the era of AI coaching, these risks become even more prevalent. While some coaches argue that AI coaching is insufficient and unable to adhere to our global code of ethics, we must remember that unethical human coaches exist, knowingly or unintentionally harming their clients. Coaching supervision and regulation, especially in the age of AI, is necessary to protect clients and ensure that coaching remains a safe and transformative practice.

B. Professionalism and credibility of coaches

Although some coaches may discredit AI coaching due to its lack of prior knowledge, it will still provide more ethical and cautionary measures than the unchecked actions of unethical or unknowingly poor coaches. As we promote the transformative benefits of coaching, let us ensure that we guard against the negative impact that unsupervised coaching can pose to clients.

Additionally, a required mark of accreditation or regulation will enforce the standard of higher-quality coaches. Whilst ICF, AC, and EMCC offer coaching accreditation – it’s an entirely optional and inequal endorsement. Even within their own organisations, the standards aren’t enforced. I recently spoke with an experienced mentor within one of these bodies’ mentorship programmes, who explained that they aren’t provided with training or CPD, and have no requirement for supervision; how is this body supposed to be a standard of professionalism?

C. Quality assurance of coaching services

Quality assurance is crucial in coaching services, particularly in light of the rise in Artificial Intelligence (AI) coaching. The absence of coaching regulations has allowed those 2-hour trained and amateur “coaches” to take advantage of clients’ vulnerabilities without the ethical practice required for safe coaching. While AI coaching seems insufficient, the same can be said of many human “coaches” who disregard the Global Code of Ethics. We need coaching supervision and regulation now more than ever to prevent both human and AI coaches from misinterpreting and misusing their power. As professionals in this industry, we must prioritise accountability and public trust by ensuring coaches hold the required knowledge and training, adhere to ethical standards, and provide safe services to individuals seeking coaching.

The Effects of Poor Quality Human Coaches

Middle finger raised with a heart-shaped balloon on top

If coaching is to continue being a force for positive change in individuals’ lives, then poor-quality human coaches must be weeded out. As previously noted, coaching can help individuals achieve their goals and improve their psychological well-being. But poor quality coaches can undermine these efforts. In contrast to human coaches, AI coaches are created via algorithms and do not suffer from the same potential flaws as humans. However, the efficacy of AI coaching is limited since there has not been enough research on the topic and they present their own issues such as potential biases ingrained in the coding and risk for privacy violations (as with any data). Given this, it is paramount that human coaching is done right.

This is why regulation in coaching is vital in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Coaching regulation would ensure that only qualified individuals are allowed to do coaching, which can help people feel confident in their coach’s abilities. Hence, eliminating poor-quality coaches will strengthen the efficacy of coaching in the long run.

Why coaching isn’t regulated in the UK

Despite its proven effectiveness and increasing demand, coaching is not currently regulated in the UK. This is due to a variety of factors, such as the lack of a unified governing body and the diverse range of coaching approaches and techniques available. Additionally, the idea of regulating a profession based on its impact can be tricky when considering the subjective nature of coaching outcomes. However, the emergence of AI coaching technology poses new risks and challenges that warrant regulatory attention. As we navigate the integration of AI in the coaching industry, it is essential to establish clear guidelines and standards to ensure that clients are protected and that the benefits of coaching are maximised.

March 30, 2023


Skip to content